How can humankind produce Mother
Teresa and Hitler, compassion and cruelty, humanitarianism
and terrorism? How can any human being make the destruction
of others the defining purpose of their life? These are age-old
questions that we are confronted with again and again.
According to one school of thought, war,
violence and aggression are an inevitable outcome of our
evolutionary heritage. “Man is a predator,” Robert Ardrey
wrote in the book African Genesis, “with an instinct
to kill and a genetic cultural affinity for the weapon.”
Ardrey is joined by others in this point
of view. There is evidence, behaviourist Konrad Lorenz said
in his book On Aggression, that several of our early
relatives, African Australopithecines and Peking Man, preyed
on their own kind.
Conceptual thought and speech have proven
to be both a blessing and a curse, Lorenz said. Lifting
us above all other species, while at the same time creating
conflict among ourselves, and giving rise to what he called
‘militant enthusiasm.’ As a species we still respond today
with instincts buried deep in the primal past, joining the
call to battle. Lorenz described the inevitable and ever
recurring consequences.
“One soars elated above all the ties of
everyday life, one is ready to abandon all for the call
of what, in the moment of this specific emotion, seems to
be a sacred duty. All obstacles in its path become unimportant;
the instinctive inhibitions against hurting or killing one’s
fellows lose, unfortunately, much of their power. Rational
considerations, criticism, and all reasonable arguments
against the behaviour dictated by militant enthusiasm are
silenced by an amazing reversal of all values, making them
appear not only untenable but base and dishonourable. Men
may enjoy the feeling of absolute righteousness even while
they commit atrocities. Conceptual thought and moral responsibility
are at their lowest ebb.”
But there is another side to human nature.
“There is so much suffering, so much hatred,
so much misery,” Mother Teresa said as she accepted the
Nobel Peace Prize in 1979. "I choose the poverty of
our poor people. But I am grateful to receive [the Nobel]
in the name of the hungry, the naked, the homeless, of the
crippled, of the blind, of the lepers, of all those people
who feel unwanted, unloved, uncared-for throughout society,
people that have become a burden to the society and are
shunned by everyone."
Mother Teresa began working in the Calcutta
slums in 1946, without any financial support. By 1979, The
Missionaries of Charity order she founded numbered one thousand
workers in India, living with the ‘poorest of the poor’
– operating children's homes, homes for the dying, clinics
and a leper colony. Tens of thousands of the poor and outcast
were comforted by her unconditional compassion. The Missionaries
of Charity order has grown significantly in numbers, expanding
geographically to help others in need - in Africa, Asia,
Latin America, Europe and the United States. “You can find
Calcutta all over the world,” she once said, “if you have
the eyes to see.”
When a TIME magazine reporter asked the
Dalai Lama to explain the essence of his beliefs, the Tibetan
monk just smiled and laughed. “My religion is very simple,”
he said. “My religion is kindness.”
Forced into exile by the Chinese, witness
to the devastation of his country, the Dalai Lama has chosen
to shun violence and follow the path of compassion. “When
we meet tragedy in life, we can either lose hope and fall
into self-destructive habits, or use the challenge to find
inner strength. Buddhist teachings helped me to take this
second way.”
Compassion, he says, is the ultimate source
of happiness. A sincere open heart allows communication
with other beings. It builds inner strength, and dissolves
the fear, insecurity and suspicion that separate us from
each other. The opposite of compassion is hatred and negative
feelings toward others which have a radiating effect: first
they destroy our inner happiness; then the peace in our
families, our communities, our nations; and ultimately the
world. Anger alone will not harm our enemy, although it
alone harms the self.
This is the tightrope that we humans walk.
Victorian philosopher Herbert Spencer wrote,
“in the same individual we find infinite capacity for tenderness,
sympathy, charity, love and infinite capacity for cruelty,
callousness, destruction, hate.” We cannot avoid this issue.
In the end, we must each take responsibility for what American
Zen teacher John Daido Loori calls “the whole catastrophe.”
We create the world through our own personal choices.